Monday, 7 October 2013

That's more like it


After a rather poor start to the football season, it was great to have not just a good weekend, but a fantastic one. The Football Analyst and Football Investor led the way with both services gaining over £1000 each. FI’s profit makes it the third service now into profit, joining Summer of Football and Narrow Victories. SoF and Skeeve lost a little ground, and Skeeve is now at the lowest ROI rate of all, at -34%.

Clashes

Football Elite and Narrow Victories edged forwards this week, but I am getting slightly alarmed at the number of clashes between the two. FE had Norwich (+0.5) and I, as NV, had Chelsea to win by 1 or 2 goals. Matt also went for Everton against Manchester City as a Vulnerable Home Favourite, whereas I again preferred a narrow victory for City.

On Friday, I also had a clash with TFA choosing Accrington Stanley and FI went for Dagenham & Redbridge on a DNB basis. Having already placed the TFA bet, no bet was not an option, so I stuck to the directive and backed both. Obviously it was a relief that it was not a draw, the only losing option.

With regards to the clashes with FE and NV, I have to say I backed my judgement and, for the time being, this is working out well. Matt and I have played the same matches on 4 occasions (although this is the first time it has been a main selection), and so far the count is NV 3, FE 0 and both lose 1. Now I don’t think it will carry on this way, and imagine it will even out over time. I certainly would back my selections over VHFs but, each time, it will be a hard decision to keep taking on main selections.

Risk Aversion

Having given Graeme from TFA a 4 in my Confidence ratings, mainly for the work that he puts into his service, and particularly in creating my portfolio, I was rather surprised to find myself making adjustments. Now before anyone takes this as a criticism of TFA, it was mainly instigated from a piece of analysis that Graeme shared in his monthly review. He included a statistical analysis by a subscriber called Tage, which suggested lowering stakes to minimise risk.

One of the strengths of TFA is the large number of successful systems, I currently back 11 win only systems and 2 draw ones. Now this can result in stakes of 11 points on 1 bet. Out of a bank of 100, this is over 9% of the bankroll on one selection. Now I know the system was created with an incredibly large sample and is unlikely to bust the bank, but certainly the chance is much higher, especially if the bets have odds that are regularly over evens.

Tage suggested just selecting as bets those with 4 or less systems and ignoring those of 5 and over. While his research backed this up, it was with different systems to what I play, but I got me straight onto Excel. So I have decided to limit my stakes to a maximum of just four. Rather than ignoring those with 5 or more, I will just limit myself to 4 points (or 4 ½ points on aways) per bet.

I have already tested the effects on last year’s equivalent portfolio and it does bring down the ROC from 247% to 143%, but ROI is up to 20.4% from 16.3%. It brings the max draw down, although not significantly enough to change bank size but I think I will be more comfortable with the bet sizes.

In a way it answers all the slight concerns I had in my review. Not only does it reduce risk in the TFA portfolio, I feel it will also address the balance of the whole portfolio. In fact I turned over almost identical amounts on FI as TFA last week.

So how did it work out? Well to be honest when I placed the bets I imagined I was giving all those systems a great boost as they would all win handsomely and I would be regretting the additional £1000 that I could have won if I had more balls! In the end only one of the three won, costing me just £32 – (£280 saved on Plymouth and Blackburn and £312 ‘lost’ on Southend).

I imagine the next 11 point home bet could be nail biting, but I do feel this is an improvement, certainly for my psyche. Dani at Sportyy.com stated in one of his Tipster School articles that:

Financial market investors are willing to win less if their portfolios risk is lower.  That is, they pay (opportunity cost) for taking a lower risk.”

I would like to think this is what I am doing, but I am open to constructive criticism!

The Week Ahead

The Interlull is on us again and while TFA, FI and Skeeve will continue playing in the lower leagues and SoF could have some angles in Brazil, it will certainly be a quiet time for me at Narrow Victories. I have considered looking into the International matches as I can see quite a few slim margins, but will probably use the time to add a few more top leagues to the blog. I have also come up with a better way of playing the bet through a form of a Venn-style Asian combination. More of that over on the sister site in the next couple of weeks.

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

August/September Summary

Lets be honest, September has not been a great month on the betting front, especially for someone who has returned to portfolio betting after a period doing the work myself. Given that I have made a profit of just over £800 in this two month period with Narrow Victories, it is a bit of a kick in the teeth to drop over three grand on pay services. Does this mean I am unhappy about the return to tipsters? Well no actually, the Narrow victories selections have got off to a strong start, but I don't have the confidence to raise the stakes yet as the sample size is not large enough to conclude this is not luck.

With target earnings of around £2000 per month, I would have to either majorly increase my staking on NV or up the number of games that are covered. While there is no doubt there are many other leagues that this system can be put to use, the data is not as readily available. Actually while I am writing this I am thinking, that is the way to create an edge, but beside the point. To make two grand a month I reckon on turnover of over £20k month, probably more due to the quieter summer months. For August and September I have turned over £28,450, which given that TFA didn't start until September is about right. Unfortunately the expected 10% return was a 9% loss overall so I suppose I am taking a positive that at least the turnover is on target.

As a point of comparison Narrow Victories had a turnover of just short of £5000, meaning I would need either a ROI of 40%, unlikely in the long run, or an increase in bank size by a factor of four (or I suppose decreasing the point bank size by a factor of four - a ten point bank, no thank you!).

So, happy to be diversified, just need more from the paid services!

Rank Tipster Staked (pts) P/L ROI ROC
1 SoF 39 13.4 34% 34%
2 Narrow Victories 48 8.1 17% 20%
3 FI 16 -8.26 -52% -8.26%
4 FE 11 -4.9 -45% -9.80%
5 Skeeve 48 -17.4 -36% -22%
6 TFA 145 -35.3 -24% -44%

I first published the table last week, and not surprisingly, the order is still the same. Summer of Football is still leading the way, and TFA still sits at the bottom. I have decided to rank by ROC as this is the way I rank services when I am looking at subscribing. As well as being a poor month (two months in this case), it has also been a poor week with all 5 paid services dropping points. TFA and FI took a large hit on their away selections, although I was saved by both portfolios double staking home bets, which on the whole did much better.

Skeeve lost all four double points bet, while SoF and FE lost a couple of points between them. On the plus side my own selections, NV, produced the goods with 8 out of 13 winning bets and over 4 points of profit.

The next part I am feeling slightly uneasy about. Obviously the best way to judge a tipster is by their results but that is never the be all and end all. Certainly looking at the table above, it would be a hard sell for 4 out of the 5 paid services! Over the last 2 or 3 years I have followed countless tipsters in all sports and while these five are by no means the most profitable for me, they are the ones that I have most confidence in, are most compatible with and can still get the money on with. So with no further ado, I want to introduce the monthly Sporting Value Confidence Ratings.

Sporting Value Confidence Ratings (out of 5)

Summer of Football - 3.5
James  had the misfortune of blowing his bank back in July and has obviously had a rethink on how his service selects bets. I had a long email discussion with him when this happened and was really impressed with his analysis of the situation and how he was going to take it forward. Since then, as the results above show he has been on quite a run.

I already think of this as a lesson for Narrow Victories, as he has kept the selections down to what he believes are the pure value ones. He also reintroduced some draw bets, which we also talked about as being profitable for him before. Whenever I try to expand my selections to new areas I think of SoF and try to stick to core areas.

This was a losing week but already get the feeling he has learned from it. In his email after 3 French Ligue 2 bets disappointed he commented:

"I'm a bit annoyed to have taken all 3 bets on. It was probably the first time I dropped our cautious approach but I hoped the AH would protect us sufficiently but it only saved us on one game."

In terms of compatibility, SoF is a very easy service to follow, bets usually arrive at a regular, if somewhat early time, and due to quoting Bet365, one can usually beat the price. I'll be honest and say I have had more confidence in the service, certainly in the first two thirds of 2012, when the results were consistently great, but really feel James is back on track.

I know a lot of people dropped out when the bank was blown, and I suppose I was in the fortunate position of not being a subscriber for all of that, but SoF is certainly still in profit for me having made considerably more the year before than the bank itself.

 Narrow Victories - 3
This is my own bets that are still going very well. As I mentioned in the early days of Sporting Value, I dropped portfolio investing to go it alone, and while this didn't work out for me, one area of my punting was very successful. Narrow Victories is the product of that: backing favourites to win by 1 or 2 goals.

During my 'individual' period, they had an ROI of about 20% and so far this season, they are rolling on at about 17%. Obviously sample size is still small, but growing and I do like a lot of elements of the bets. Firstly the stats seem to back the logic and secondly there is an element of going against the crowd as most punters will be expecting these teams to be winning by bigger margins.

The strapline to the site says they are a sort of anti-Asian Handicap, in the way that I struggled to win on backing -0.75 and -1 bets as the data was not showing that a lot of sides were consistently beating the handicaps and winning by considerable margins.

By my calculations there are between 10 and 20 bets a week to be had, which certainly by the end of this season should give me a fair sample size to judge it as a selection process.

Football Investor - 3.5
Not the best start but very early days for Stewboss this season. Have really appreciated his help in setting up my portfolio. I did have one slight gripe in that notification of bets was via Twitter rather than email but have now set up a twitter alert on my phone which is just as effective. Unfortunately FI and TFA bets due seem to arrive during kids bedtime so not always there on the dot, but prices seem to be there or thereabouts.

Football Elite - 3
This is a tricky one for me because I love most things about this service, particularly the leagues he plays in, his analysis (when given), set times for bet delivery and am really enjoying the Weekend Punting Pack. While I find I agree with nearly all of his selections, at the moment they are just not coming in. There is obviously disquiet around (Daily25 and Green All Over), but I am still giving Matt the benefit of the doubt. His email communications at the start of the season were full of vigour and optimism, giving the impression of someone fighting for their reputation and career.

I am undecided on how to play the Vulnerable Home Favourites as the matches it throws up closely mirror my Narrow Victories selections, so watching brief. He is also about to introduce Football League bets which could be interesting, but again, watching brief.

Skeeve - 2.5
Very slow start to the season, which seems to be mirroring last season. Can the second half rescue him again? I must admit to slight worries, mainly because it has always been a service I have ummed and aahed over nearly every time I have subscribed. Skeeve is the most expensive service I subscribe to and in the past it has driven me to uncomfortable levels of staking to justify it. This is no longer an issue but I still have reservations.

I know the headline figures are fantastic, and given I have subscribed I have to believe he can repeat these numbers, but the service is now so slimmed down the ROI has to be quite spectacular to give the ROC I am expecting (certainly of other services). I know away asians are his most profitable area, but his expertise in all things Conference, I wonder if there are more opportunities available to him.

The Football Analyst - 4
Given Graeme's service has dumped 44% of its bank in roughly 3 weeks, I am still very confident in his offerings. I suppose this is a reflection of the incredible amount of work that goes into TFA. I must admit I did subscribe last year but, foolishly, tried to go it myself by designing my own way of playing his different systems. I am sure that I would still have given up following tipsters last year if I had allowed Graeme to create one of his tailored products but I probably would have thought about it for much longer if I had.

Am I convinced by the tailored portfolio, not completely. Graeme has already shared his doubts about the draw selections, especially when clashing with other - usually - away selections. I am also a bit nervous with the 11 point home bets, which each are 9% of the bank.

I am also concerned that while the bank size is well balanced in the portfolio, its turnover so far is considerably higher than the others - at present, it is 41%, almost double its proportion of overall betting bank. But I am confident it is a well crafted and thought out portfolio that is backed up with sufficient data for me to be looking forward in good heart.

I mentioned at the start that I was slightly uneasy giving out these ratings, it is probably the last vestiges of being an ex-Maths teacher. Writing reports, and at the same time reporting on myself, almost Ofsted style, were never my favourite parts of the job. I suppose these scales are arbitrary, unless qualified. From my point of view, 4.5+ would be indicating that I should be upping stakes/bank size and 2 or less would imply start to think about dropping it.

At present no one is in either region, and neither should they be at the start of a season, so lets hope we see some more 4s over time.

Portfolio musings

The triggers for calling it a day back in October last year were many, but top of the list was the endless restrictions and the effort it was taking to get bets on. Horse racing was particularly bad, and more niche services, but it was a big hit on Skeeve and Summer of Football that was the icing on the cake.

Thinking back on that time my portfolio was in total flux and the effort in getting bets on with multiple bookie were not only placing a strain on me, but on the record keeping. Every task became much more complex. As more services became unplayable the portfolio became unbalanced and a lot of time was spent looking for replacements. I can't remember where I read it but one of the most time consuming parts of following a portfolio of tipsters is the constant desire to find the next best thing.

I have tried this season to stick to what I have, but the most addictive part of this portfolio investing does seem to be this desire to add to it. I think that the unbalanced feel due to TFA's high turnover has had this effect, much to my chagrin.

I am already a subscriber to Football Form Labs Black, replacing lite with black when the offer was on, as it is a great help in researching Narrow Victories. With their, all over my twitter feed, promotions in the last few months I have found myself drawn back into their daily reports. When I first followed as part of FFL SBC Lite, I did not enjoy it. There is no announcement of timing and being a lite product the price has often gone as it went to main subscribers first. I know it is probably their most profitable area, but I do not like ante-post betting and there is a lot of it on their daily reports.

So what has pulled me back? Well they seem to have a strong record on O/U goals bets and Asian Handicaps, 2 areas where I struggled. Am I going to add it to my portfolio, I don't know. At present I am following at £50 a pop just to see if I can get the prices and actually remember to check when bets are up.

Just as a bit of self-advertising, yesterday I published the second post on Narrow Victories, highlighting potential plays in Serie A, to go with last weeks analysis of the Premier League. Not sure why I am advertising as no intention of going public as a tipster. These types of bets have very little chance of working as a tip due to the dutching nature, but it keeps me honest and builds up a bank of research for me to refer to.

I hope that other portfolios haven't gone as badly as this in September, but I am sure things are about to head in an upward direction. Good Luck.


Sunday, 22 September 2013

That didn't go to plan

I mentioned on Friday that there was a lot down, unfortunately most of it has ended up in the bookies satchel (or eWallet). Futbol-24 updates on my phone were not making an afternoon children's birthday party go any quicker, although, for a short while, Middlesborough did look like they were about to put the TFA bets into profit.

Anyway I don't want to dwell on the negatives as there were some positives among the carnage. 
Noteably I felt I coped psychologically with some of the biggest individual bets I have ever placed - yes, they did lose, so properly tested.

Rather than put a P&L on the weekend, I want to share where the portfolio is standing, taking the start of August as a logical starting point. As I mentioned 3 or 4 posts ago it consists of two systems, TFA and FI, and three more analytical systems, namely Skeeve, SoF and FE. I also run my own selections, favouring one or two goal victories for strong favourites.

So far this season Summer of Football is streaking ahead:







Rank Tipster Staked (pts) P/L ROI ROC
1 SoF 33 14 42% 35%
2 Me! 33 3.7 11% 9.25%
3 FI 4 -0.4 -10% -0.40%
4 FE 7 -3.15 -45% -6.30%
5 Skeeve 44 -13.4 -30% -17%
6 TFA 100 -24 -24% -24%

Overall I have lost £865 on turnover of just over £20k. Not the end of the world by any means, especially as only one of the commercial tipsters is in profit. My major worry is the imbalance caused by the number of bets generated by TFA. In terms of bank size for each portfolio, they are relatively evenly balanced but this is definitely not the case for turnover. This service is also generating the biggest bet sizes, with the maximum possible bet (11 separate system selections on a home team - take note Blackburn, you owe me!) is nearly three times the maximum that would be bet on any other service.

So onwards and upwards, I have no doubt that FI will start churning out the bets soon to balance things out and FE is certain to be more productive once there is enough form in the bank. I would like to add that I found Matt's weekend punting pack very interesting and will be looking to use his A/E tables in aiding my selections.
Keep the faith, all that have been through this weekend, judging by twitter there have been a few!

Friday, 20 September 2013

Scary weekend

By my calculations I have just bet 57.5 points of a 100 point bank on TFA! I think "pray" is quite an accurate reading of the situation!


Must admit I told Graeme when he was creating my portfolio that I wasn't scared of the workload, and he did mention that this portfolio aims to turnover the whole bank every two weeks! So fingers crossed.

That said, it doesn't feel as much like a balanced portfolio at present, more like TFA and a few others. I am sure once Football Investor gets going with all its leagues, things will even out. Certainly my couple of dutched narrow victory selections on Liverpool and Chelsea seem very trivial indeed!

PS Blog seems to be slightly out of order as I was editing the labels.

Monday, 16 September 2013

Back, but not really!

Six months on, and distinct lack of posts. The truth is making your own selections is distinctively more time consuming than I had allocated to it. It was also not the solution for my betting as while a profit was gained, there was not enough turnover without enormous bets.

What it did highlight is which areas I am strong at (and obviously weak ones too). In terms of strengths, I made a lot of money with winning margin bets, notably 1 goal home wins and dutching 1 and 2 goal margins. The other more successful football areas were doubles and anytime goal scorers.

Areas of weakness were definitely asian handicaps and over/under bets, as well as straight 1X2 selections. In fact, my struggles with these types of bets gave me a nudge back towards portfolio betting, but more of that later.

The other sporting area that went well was top class racing, particularly National Hunt.

So where are we now? Well to a certain extent I have gone full circle with add ons. Following a portfolio of tipsters can be very rewarding but can take over your life somewhat. Having no control of when selections arrive is doable in this mobile age but after a while dominates your life! I have endeavoured to set up a portfolio that is easy to follow both in terms of getting the money on and having a set time for bet delivery. I have also concentrated mainly on football so there is a quiet period through the summer (although not dead).

So how is it made up?

The football Analyst
THe Football Investor
Skeeve
Football Elite
Summer of Football

I must admit while I was in the relative novice stage, I struggled with TFA and FI, and had a preference for the more analytical tipsters such as FE and SoF. While I still benefit from these types of write-ups, I am now more interested in turnover and ROC above my education, although that is by no means over.

In fact I would go so far to say I am most excited by TFA and FI, especially as both have custom made portfolios to my needs and targets. I am also sticking to these services as, on the whole they have regular posting times, doing away with the rather inhibiting random bet chasing at all times of the day.

I am also devoting a small fraction of my bankroll to my own selections, primarily on my football winning margins but also with top class jumps racing.

I stated in the title that I was back, but not really and the reason is I have no interest in being a tipster but feel that the blog can keep me focused and allow me to put the thoughts and ideas down that often drift away into the ether. Also since Rowan's move to gallops live, his handy blog roll is less useful as I don't go there as often (only for links). I am sure I could just set up a RSS feed but I will give this blogging malarkey another go!

I also, in the next few weeks, plan to set up two more blogs that focus on my part of the betting portfolio. These are not intended as tipping sites, just as a store of ideas and research, and again useful blogs/links.

Portfolio reminders

Last Thursday I was away from my computer and had to place TFA bets using my phone and someone else's laptop and while I got away with it, could not quite remember which of the systems I was playing. So I plan to use this blog as a depository of my portfolios that I can always refer to. I know, not very interesting for casual readers, but the main purpose is to improve my betting.

So TFA
100 pt bank

Home Stake Away Stake
6-22 1.00 0.50
7-21 1.00 0.50
7-22 1.00 0.50
8-21 1.00 0.50
8-22 1.00 0.50
31-42 1.00 0.50
33-41 1.00 0.50
33-42 1.00 0.50
TOX 1.00 0.50
STOY 1.00 0.50
STOZ 1.00 0.50
D3-D6 1.00 1.00
D3-D7 1.00 1.00

According to Graeme the portfolio made 247pts profit last season, and over the last 3 seasons, an average profit has been made of 200pts+. I will be overjoyed with half that!

Football Investor
100 pt bank

Combo system (no euro): 2pt Home, 1pt away
SZ Home >2.15: 1pt win if <2.75 1pt dnb if 2.75
SZ Away >2.75: 1pt DNB
Top flight Euro >4.0: 0.5pt win

Stew boss anticipates the all important ROC% averages 225% per season over the 8 seasons and 2012-13 was 169%. Anything close to that will be amazing!

Sunday, 10 February 2013

Quiet Sunday selections

Australia carries on doing the business with 2 one goal home wins but European football is going through a bit of a lean spell over the last two weekends, but nothing drastic.

I have two selections, one a little understaked as best price is with Bwin and they only ever let me get a return of £80 these days. The bet here is Benteke to score anytime for Villa. The price at 2.75 is considerably better than anywhere else (bar Sportingbet) and he has scored in his last four.

£30ish of Benteke to score anytime 2.75 Bwin

My other bet is in the late match in France and is a risky dutching selection. Lyon are a solid home team with a lot of to nil wins whereas Lille are a way off their form of the last couple of years but are relatively tight at the back. I am looking at a 1-0 2-0 combination with combined odds of around 4.67, as opposed to 3.7 (with Corals which is a non-option) for a straight win to nil.

£30 dutching Lyon to win 1-0 and 2-0 (8.0 and 11.0) VC/Betfair